response to Laramie project

the section that we read, perfectly encapsulates the Meta-ness of the play in general. We have a narrator introducing characters after they started to speak, but the narrator only serves to do that. The narrator doesn't say where the play is at, the time that passes or anything we regularly associate with a narrator's responsibilities. Then there's the break when the writers of the play, include themselves. Talking about wanting to skip a person's interview and rather just writing what the priest said, they included the dialogue they shared with him. so we see the skeleton of the play as it's being performed.